
- by x32x01 ||
Dynamic programming is a technique used to solve complex problems by breaking them down into simpler sub-problems, solving each one only once, and re-using those solutions to build up the final answer.
In plain terms: instead of recalculating the same thing over and over again, you store results and reuse them. That’s what makes DP powerful - it turns slow, repetitive code into efficient, lean code.
Two Key Properties for DP
For a problem to be a good candidate for dynamic programming, it typically needs two properties:
When both of these conditions hold, you can apply DP.
Two Main Approaches: Memoization & Tabulation
Both methods avoid recalculating the same thing many times.
Classic Dynamic Programming Examples
= fib(n-1) + fib(n-2). Without DP the runtime is exponential, with DP it becomes linear.
Why Use Dynamic Programming?
How to Solve a DP Problem - Step by Step
Here’s a workflow to solve DP problems effectively:
A Python Example: Minimum Coins to Make Change
Here:
Common Mistakes When Learning DP
When NOT to Use Dynamic Programming
DP is powerful, but it's not always the right tool. If your problem:
Practice Makes Perfect
Dynamic programming becomes a lot easier with real practice. Try popular problems like:
Final Thoughts
Dynamic programming is not just a fancy interview topic - it’s a mindset. It teaches you how to think about reuse, structure, and optimization. Once you understand DP, you’ll find yourself spotting overlapping sub-problems in everyday coding tasks. And when you apply it correctly - you’ll see major improvements in performance and code elegance.
So next time you face a problem that seems to “explode” in time complexity, ask:

In plain terms: instead of recalculating the same thing over and over again, you store results and reuse them. That’s what makes DP powerful - it turns slow, repetitive code into efficient, lean code.
Two Key Properties for DP
For a problem to be a good candidate for dynamic programming, it typically needs two properties:Overlapping Subproblems
This means the problem can be broken into smaller parts that repeat themselves. For example, when computing the Fibonacci sequence recursively, you compute fib(n-2) many times.Optimal Substructure
This means the optimal solution to the larger problem can be derived from optimal solutions of its sub-problems. In other words: solve sub-problems optimally and combine them.When both of these conditions hold, you can apply DP.
Two Main Approaches: Memoization & Tabulation
Memoization (Top-Down)
You start with the big problem and recursively solve smaller ones, caching results so you don’t repeat work. Example in Python: Python:
def fib(n, memo={}):
if n in memo:
return memo[n]
if n < 2:
return n
memo[n] = fib(n-1, memo) + fib(n-2, memo)
return memo[n]
print(fib(10)) # 55
Tabulation (Bottom-Up)
You build the solution from the “ground up.” You solve the smallest sub-problems first and use them to build larger ones. Example: Python:
def fib_tab(n):
if n < 2:
return n
dp = [0]*(n+1)
dp[0], dp[1] = 0, 1
for i in range(2, n+1):
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2]
return dp[n]
print(fib_tab(10)) # 55
Classic Dynamic Programming Examples
Fibonacci Sequence
We already saw how overlapping sub-problems appear when computing fibCoin Change Problem
Given a set of coin denominations and a target amount, find the number of ways to make that amount, or the minimum number of coins required. These problems have overlapping sub-problems and optimal substructure, and can be solved efficiently with DP.Why Use Dynamic Programming?
- Improves performance a lot: many recursive solutions move from exponential time to polynomial time.
- Encourages structured thinking: you learn to break problems into smaller pieces and reuse work.
- Useful in algorithms, data structures, interviews, and real-world software.
How to Solve a DP Problem - Step by Step
Here’s a workflow to solve DP problems effectively:- Identify if overlapping sub-problems exist: does the naive solution compute the same thing multiple times?
- Check if there’s optimal substructure: can you build the answer from answers to smaller problems?
- Choose memoization or tabulation approach depending on which suits you or your language.
- Define state and transitions: decide what your DP state represents (e.g., dp = max value using first i items).
[*]Implement and test: run your code and verify with small test cases.
A Python Example: Minimum Coins to Make Change
Python:
def min_coins(coins, amount):
# dp[i] = minimum coins needed to make amount i
dp = [float('inf')] * (amount + 1)
dp[0] = 0
for coin in coins:
for x in range(coin, amount + 1):
dp[x] = min(dp[x], dp[x - coin] + 1)
return dp[amount] if dp[amount] != float('inf') else -1
coins = [1, 2, 5]
print(min_coins(coins, 11)) # Output: 3 (5+5+1)
- We define a bottom-up dp array.
- We fill it iteratively.
- We reuse computed results.
Common Mistakes When Learning DP
- Trying to apply DP when there’s no overlapping sub-problem.
- Using DP without a clear definition of state or transitions.
- Relying only on recursion without caching → leads to timeouts.
- Not understanding the difference between memoization and tabulation.
When NOT to Use Dynamic Programming
DP is powerful, but it's not always the right tool. If your problem:- Doesn’t have overlapping sub-problems, or
- Doesn’t allow combining solutions of sub-problems into a full solution (no optimal substructure)
...then DP will not help much. In fact, a simpler greedy or direct method may be better.
Practice Makes Perfect
Dynamic programming becomes a lot easier with real practice. Try popular problems like:- Climbing stairs (ways to reach the top)
- Longest Common Subsequence (LCS)
- Knapsack (0/1 or unbounded)
- House Robber
- Partition equal subset sum
Final Thoughts
Dynamic programming is not just a fancy interview topic - it’s a mindset. It teaches you how to think about reuse, structure, and optimization. Once you understand DP, you’ll find yourself spotting overlapping sub-problems in everyday coding tasks. And when you apply it correctly - you’ll see major improvements in performance and code elegance.So next time you face a problem that seems to “explode” in time complexity, ask:
- Can I break this into sub-problems?
- Are sub-problems overlapping?
- Can the solution be built from optimal smaller parts?

Last edited: